No I didn’t. “Ad hominem” has a meaning. It means “against hominems” which are words that sound the same but are spelled differently. Some times you are beyond the pail.
parsy, who forgot candy apples are good and beautiful, too
ROFLMAO
Why don't you debate with anything but WKA? Because you can't and you know it. The Virginia citizenship law passed in 1779 was writtten by Jefferson you drone.
If he didn't know what the common law was, I surely don't know who else would have.
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: “argument toward the person” or “argument against the person”), is an argument which links the validity of a premise to a characteristic or belief of the person advocating the premise; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
You'll notice I took the definition from the site that you received your cut & paste jd from to show it is a valid definition. May I suggest you open a book once in a while. Your cut & paste is lending you no credibility.
Yes, I finally get it. All you DRONES were hatched from pods because you have no concept of natural law, natures law wherein it requires no law to make the ‘natural born’ a citizen; unlike the feudal form of government wherein it requires a man made law to confer citizenship onto a person.
Homophonephobia can cause dizziness and fainting.
Res ipsa loquitur. Amen.