Ok, so now you're quoting WIKI as your argument for Obama
and his status as a British Subject. Tsk, tsk
After giving you multiple direct quotes from Wong Kim Art
v US, and proving that you have neither the legal scholarship nor
interpretive abilities of a first year law school drop-out,
you've shown your understanding on this is nil.
Everyone who has read this thread is now just a little dumber
because of your nonsensical blathering.
It's patently obvious that it is YOU who has not read
Wong Kim Art v US.
SO please demonstrate your knowledge on Wong Kim Art or any
other case law of your choosing, or return back to the
DailyKOS peanut gallery from whence you came.
No, Grasshopper. I was sending you little tidbits that you might use to start reading up on legal issues so you don’t meander off on so many dead ends. For the common law, you might use that first one to understand how common law has been used, even as late as, well today. And the second, to understand what all that stuff was in Wong that you keeping bits and pieces of.
You still have a little Blackstone problem, among several others...
parsy, who is waiting for the monkey picture response