So you say. But nothing in Justice Gray's opinion supports such a claim. As anyone who has read it would see.
| > Its an ALL or NOTHING deal, Non-Seq. > So you say. But nothing in Justice Gray's opinion Sure he does. Again, it's there as CLEAR as CLEAR can be:
“The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.” Justice Gray turned to Blackstone to ascertain the meaning of "Natural Born Subject," did he not?
What was Justice Gray ruling on, anyway? Does Wong Kim Ark even apply? Was Wong Kim Ark running for President? And was Justice Gray ruling upon the definition of “Natural Born Citizen,” ESPECIALLY in the context of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5? ... just trying to be nice and offer you an Exit Door, Non-Seq. |