The Lucas Smith CPGH BC has lots of fascinating features, many of which have been clearly substantiated after the fact by Smith and others, while other features have yet to be verified.
Many of the features seem to be improbable for a forger to have included, such as the partial fingerprint (probably left thumb) visible on the left side of the image. How often do forgers leave their fingerprints on their creations? FBI and Interpol would have fingerprints of domestic and international forgers.
The fingerprint is consistent with a print that could have been left during the potentially messy placement of the baby footprint. If not a print of a forger, it would be a print of a 1961 CPGH hospital employee charged with footprinting babies. That person could still be alive (I hope). Intelligence services may well know who that person is, if real.
Administrators and doctors there told WND sources that in 2004 a high-level team of Kenya’s National Security Intelligence Service came to the hospital and seized all files containing birth certificate documents from the years 1960 through 1963.
According to the administrators and doctors interviewed at the hospital, Kenya’s National Security Intelligence Service returned the seized files to the hospital four months later. Hospital officials were able to determine that records were missing or altered.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=108773
That’s very interesting...the Kenyan document apparently left the hospital in 2004. Looks like it may eventually have ended up in the hands of someone who wasn’t a Raila Odinga supporter.
I like it...
I have no clue if the Smith document is real or not. I tend to think it’s not but stranger things have happened. What struck me was how the DUmmies and others like them flipped out. Then one of them posted it online and claimed they did it, but it didn’t match up with the one Smith posted.