His claim was he was protecting his “source” from inquiries. Ok. Then don’t offer them as a source.
I didn’t offer him as a source. I said I asked “a lawyer.” That could be anybody. patlin suggested the lawyer was a liberal. I clarified by providing further details. That was the end of it. I didn’t cite the judge as an expert or offer him as the source of some irrefutable and spectacular evidence.
Y’all are ridiculous.
We’re supposed to accept his word! Ha ha! Just like we’re supposed to accept his master’s word! Triple Ha ha!
Once bitten, twice shy, as they say...