Good comment, but it will fall on deaf brains. The bulk of the WKA decision is a review of common law and case law in trying to ascertain the meaning of the various types of citizenship. The meat is in the conclusion where citizenship (not natural born citizenship) is dependent on the status of the parents being permanent immigrants and not visiting scholars. Nevertheless, there will be more cherry-picking and twisting by faithers than you'd see at an IFP Clinton intern party.
Yeah. I know. A lot of assumptions being made. Freepers have been discussing and researching this for a looooong time. It is insulting to pretend any of these people haven’t researched. I believe that was the point.