Parsley,
You’ve had a hard-on for Wong Kim Ark the last 2 days almost as much as you’ve had one for Orly. Wong’s been your case law of choice.
About Natural Born Citizen, WONG KIM ARK v US plainly says, “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that.”
You don’t like Vattel. Now you don’t like Blackstone.
Why don’t you just post the reference that suits your agenda best?
I kinda already thought you had ... thus the EPIC FAIL.
If one is going to argue that Obama isn’t an NBC, then Wong is the starting place. Period. That’s not because I picked Wong, but because thats where and when SCOTUS first made that ruling. That if you are born in the USA, and the exceptions don’t apply, then you are a citizen. Period. Real Simple.
And again, you are showing complete ignorance of the law. WHERE DID YOU GET THE IDEA I DON’T LIKE BLACKSTONE? I have a new $200 plus leather bound set. I have 150 year old American set, but not matched. 1850s Something I think. And somewhere, a 2 volume softcover new edition in modern english.
So where do you get that idea?
What do you know about the law? If it is very little, which it appears to be, for God’s sake, just say so. It will make learning a whole bunch easier.
parsy, who says it is time for honesty