If I hadn’t read the case, I wouldn’t have known to cite the permanent-resident clauses nor would I have been able to immediately and easily shoot down your misconstrued and irrelevant citations. That you resort now to a drawn out, but transparent futility game fails to refute my arguments. If you choose to re-engage in an actual debate and show that you might understand the decision, feel free to post something constructive and meaningful. Just beware that I am always ready to tear down your flimsy arguments. Always.
Okay—a test: what did Wong say about American indians? You have 60 seconds....
parsy, who wants you to know these response are time logged at FR....ready...steady.....GO!