OMG, the Diaz-Salazar case???!
LOL. That started in the After-Birther talking points on Jan 25.
Yep, that confirms it. Parsy is a Politijab retread.
How quickly before Parsy can get one of these in his FReepmail?
Which says "...see also, e.g., Diaz-Salazar v. I.N.S., 700 F.2d 1156, 1160 (7th Cir. 1983) (noting in its recitation of the facts that despite the fact father was not a citizen of the United States, he had children who were “natural-born citizens of the United States”)"
http://openjurist.org/700/f2d/1156
These Indiana judges concluded by using an INS deportation case to quote in their dismissal which was accepted as fact by the sitting circuit Judge Cudahy, appointed by Jimmy Carter, that is irrelevant to his deportation case. The NBC statement probably originally came from some ill-informed paralegal who worked for the lawyer of the illegal alien.
You've got to be kidding me Parsy if you think this Indiana court case, you love to post, could really stand up to any scrutiny. These guys threw ink to paper just to sweep this case under the rug. If I can shoot holes in it from the early hours in the morning think of what a good team would do with it. It is pure folly barely worth the paper it's written on.
LOL. That started in the After-Birther talking points on Jan 25.
Yep, that confirms it. Parsy is a Politijab retread.
How quickly before Parsy can get one of these in his FReepmail?
You haven’t shot holes in squat. Like Orly, you are blaming a judge for making decisions you don’t like. Do you think this is the only case to run this way? And that Diaz case-—IT BACKS UP MY POINT! See the “natural born citizens” language in it? A 1983 case. Same thing as Wong. Same thing as the Indiana case.
parsy, who says Wake Up.