Replies

August 1961

S M Tu W Th F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31

August 1969

S M Tu W Th F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31

As is clear the dates “Filed On” fall on three different days. I don’t think that the DOH did them on a single day. The Dr. who did the delivery would have been responsible for signing the forms for the birth he/she attended. So unless all three bables were delivered by the same Dr. having all the forms pile up onto one desk, out of order, and “Filed” on different days seems too big a strech.

Take my BC information for example. Mine was signed by the MD on the 13th of August, it got to the DOH the next day and THAT day the 14th, is when if was filed and given a number on the 14th. So it is plausable that a document could get signed the day before it was filed in the DOH. Give it a little more room, say it got to the DOH late in the day on the 14th, maybe it would not have gotten filed till the 15th, but that would have been 8 days after my birth so thats unlikely in my case, and indeed didn’t happen, it was filed on the 14th.

So, the Nordyke Cert gets SIGNED on the 11th, and is filed on the 11th. So we know that a doc. can get signed the day before, and the day of and be filed. This means that Obama’s was signed the day before the Filed Date or the day of the filing date. By CIRCUMSTANCE, because of the DATE on the documents, Obama’s (if Legit) HAS to have a lower number than Nordyke. It was filed three days before Nordyke’s was even signed be the delivering doctor and filed with the state.

It DOESN’T. Its AFTER Nordyke.

The only way I can see that as possible is if the delivering doctor was the same, and held onto all of the forms until the 11th of August, and sent them in all at once, and Obama’s Filed on date was changed to match the signature date of the attending Physician who delivered him. That makes no sense however, because the 11th would have been inside the window for the 7 day filing requirement. Why is the 8th listed? Simplest answer is because that is the actual date it was filed... unless it is a forgery.

I find it very interesting to note this however, The Dunham’s and the Nordyke’s KNEW each other. Those twin girls and Barry went to Punahoe together.

http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2008/Dec/22/ln/hawaii812220320.html

I wouldn’t put a whole lot of value on the BC numbers.

My brother and I happen to be the first-born babies in another state, county, city at an earlier time in history. I was the first New Year’s baby and my brother was second in that particular year. My BC number issued by the county health dept is #8 and brother’s is #9.

This seems to suggest to me that the registrar assigned numbers as they came off a pile in her in-box.

That being stated, I’m all in favor off throwing out the Usurper-In-Chief because he is not a Natural Born Citizen.