Most lawsuits use proper English and sentences that actually make some sense. Yours looked like something you copied from Orly Taitz. I understand she's your hero - understandably, since she's sabotaging honest attempts to get at the truth. Must be something they teach in ACORN academy.
You set forth your facts and allegations step by step so that a logical basis is provided for the other side and the court.
I understand you don't want to admit that the facts have already been set forth in a logical basis. While you're rambling on and posting juvenile nonsense, your obvious objective is to derail the conversation and try to deflect from the very simple, obvious facts. Obama's birth was filed and published in an orderly fashion that makes it impossible to have a higher number on his alleged COLB than what the legitimate Nordyke birth certificates show. Either his alleged cert number is fraudulent, the other details on his alleged COLB or fraudulent, or a combination of both. It's simple. It's logical. All you're doing is acting out.
Please humor me. I was trying to leave it open for you to SHINE!
Watch: You wrote :
Obama’s birth was filed and published in an orderly fashion that makes it impossible to have a higher number on his alleged COLB than what the legitimate Nordyke birth certificates show.
That IS NOT A FACT. THAT IS AN OPINION. THAT IS YOUR CONCLUSION. That don’t work in a law suit.
Break it down into its component facts. If you can’t or it comes out reading sorta screwed up, then there is probably something wrong with your reasoning. This is where you catch it.
parsy, who says try to understand the difference between a fact and a conclusion
Ignore the pic, it was meant for someone else. I clicked on the wrong post. Sorry. :)