|
> The only people claiming to have seen it are the Bobsey Twins from Factcheckamateurs.org, yet for some reason Oh, I know.
I'm trying to demonstrate the BIASED “Chain of Evidence” for Obama’s “Birth Certificate” From
And all for a "birth certificate" which has NEVER actually appeared in Court.
|
Oh, I see. Hmmmmm.
Clarence Darrow III: Your Honor my client would like to introduce his COLB at this time. I have this marked as Defense 23, a copy for the Plaintiff, and the court....
Orly Taitz: Hmmmm. Your Honor, I would like to object to the entry of this document.
Judge: And...
Orly Taitz: Who? Me?
Judge: Yes Ms. Taitz.
Orly Taitz: Please?
Judge: Please?
Orly Taitz: Yes. I object to the entry of this Document, please.
Judge: No Ms. Taitz. You need to provide the basis for your objection.
Orly Taitz: Uh....Hearsay?
Judge: Hearsay?????
Orly Taitz: Yes your Honor. I didn’t hear him say he was ever going to enter it.
Judge: Well you heard him now. So give me a basis.
Orly Taitz: Uh....Chain of evidence, Your Honor, chain of evidence.
Judge: What in God’s name are you talking about?
Orly Taitz: Well, uh it didn’t go thru the metal detector, I mean it didn’t come straight here, and was in plain view when the officer did the search...over at the metal detector with an expectation of privacy for all the ....immunities and privileges clause of the Commerce Commission with Liberty and Justice for all.
Judge: Ms. Taitz. This is a certified copy from the State of Hawaii’s Department of Health. There is no “chain of evidence” which applies. Your objection over ruled. Marked and accepted as Defense 23.
Orly Taitz: Your Honor, since it is a Defense Exhibit, does it count against us on the Offense side?
parsy, who says you know this is how this would go down!
to 
to 
to 
