Neither does it confer citizenship on children born to foreigner nationals residing in the US per the authors & congressional records of the 14th Amendment which Grey cited in Elk, but then disregarded in WKA.
Again, what changed in those years between 1884 & 1898? Nothing!
It don’t matter. 1898 happened. You don’t get the luxury of a do-over without convincing the court that it was wrong. I am sure some people think Dred Scott was decided wrong. It don’t matter.
What you are saying is “If we go back to the law I like, and disregard the law that happened later which I don’t like. . .then Obama is a usurper!”
parsy, who says you can not believe that is reasonable
Type—The law does NOT confer...