To: Red Steel
"And yet approximately $1.7 million was paid from the Obama campaign to the firm Perkins & Coie who defended Obama before the Government lawyers who took over in about June of last year.
Oh, pulleeeeze. You have no evidence that a penny of that $1.7 million had anything to do with Birther suits. Please... before you can connect dots, you actually have to have dots.
Obama had lawyers represent him in exactly 3 cases total. At least one of them was pro bono and free to Obama. In the other two (actually in all three), the lawyers moved for dismissals and got them. If you think that cost $1.7 million, I want some of what you're smoking.
To: EnderWiggins
Great to see you still posting Mr Ayers! How’s Bernadine?
1,015 posted on
02/25/2010 4:08:24 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
To: EnderWiggins; STARWISE
Oh, pulleeeeze. You have no evidence that a penny of that $1.7 million had anything to do with Birther suits. Please... before you can connect dots, you actually have to have dots. Yeah, Perky & Kook worked for Obama to create Obama pom poms and jiggles! Oh, there's evidence fool and it's more than credible than your phantom play buddy you got. Money that Obama for his campaign is funny money to him. Giving it away to a firm who represented him in eligibility suits is no big deal. Gee, guess who is now Obama's White House council?
Obama had lawyers represent him in exactly 3 cases total. At least one of them was pro bono and free to Obama. In the other two (actually in all three), the lawyers moved for dismissals and got them. If you think that cost $1.7 million, I want some of what you're smoking.
Answered above. It's nothing to what the crack you're smoking.
Starwise you have the evidence handy?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson