Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
The point is, we ONLY have what the officials in Hawaii tell us. They are held to some account for what they say as they are acting in official capacities and are responsible for their work.
HDOH has been inconsistent, and they are parsing their language to an impressive extent. It’s not accidental. It’s because they are getting conflicting information, conflicting guidance, and over everything else, they are covering something up. Every time some new angle comes along, they go scrambling in another direction. There is confusion in that department, and on an issue that OUGHT to be cut and dried. Apparently it isn’t.
Why?
Shy not just come out and say that what the cretin has posted matches records. Thats not revealing anything other than the President’s honesty.
Oh but never mind that.
The man is still a British born citizen and never was not ever could be a Natural Born Citizen. The fact that he traveled on an Indonesian Passport after reaching Adulthood is the final nail in the coffin.
For me this is just about proving that he took his Step-Dad’s name and gave up his US citizenship, which because of his passport use, he could never get back in it’s original NBC (if he had it at all, I don’t think he did, but SCOTUS has to decide that) status upon reversing the Adoption.
Thats why I am here.
~~~~~
Who's WE ?
And for a slight change of pace: (and I want to know who the “we” are too! Good catch! He can’t say he and his tapeworm..)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2458535/posts
Appeals court: We’re listening to eligibility case (re: Kerchner v. Obama)
WND ^ | February 23, 2010 | Bob Unruh
Posted on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 1:03:52 PM by rxsid
“Appeals court: We’re listening to eligibility case
Judges grant permission for lengthy filing in case challenging Obama
An appeals court has indicated it is listening to arguments in a case that challenges Barack Obama’s occupancy in the Oval Office with a ruling that gives special permission for an extra-long document to be filed in the case.
WND has reported on the case brought by attorney Mario Apuzzo in January 2009 on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr.
Named as defendants were Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives, former Vice President Dick Cheney and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
The case alleges Congress failed to follow the Constitution, which “provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate ‘elected’ by the Electoral College Electors.”
The complaint also asserts “when Obama was born his father was a British subject/citizen and Obama himself was the same.” The case contends the framers of the U.S. Constitution, when they adopted the requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen,” excluded dual citizens.”
More here:http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=125985
Do you feel better now?
My classmate and I. Who else?
Nightmare situation? Don’t you think you are overdoing it a little? Living in the United States may be a little bumpy sometimes. We may get really p*ssed off at our leaders, and pundits, and the quality of television programming.
But a nightmare? Let’s see, you have the right to vote, to have a gun, to come and go as you please. You can call the “Supreme Leader” of our country a commie pinko Muslim terrorist LIBERAL. You can march, carry signs, write letters, start a blog, and drive as big a vehicle as you can afford.
And you think you’re living in a nightmare? The worst thing you have to put up with seems to be ME, any my gentle, teasing manner.
So, thank you! I am glad to Number One on your list.
And if, after reflection, you really think you are living a nightmare, because your guy lost the election....let me tell you the real nightmare would be if there were no elections to lose. Most of the world lives in those kind of countries.
parsy, who will endeavor to persevere!
This was debunked.
parsy.
Yeah, but you got to admit that name was good!
parsy, who is looking for brownie points
He can fish all that he likes. Not everything that’s known is put online.
The BOSS will know ... ;)
Well, they could have left the hmmmm, hmmmm, hmmmm off his name..
Barack Hussein Obama, hmmmm, hmmmm, hmmmm
parsy
Your classmate .. the one who allegedly lives
in HI and was allegedly digging around for info
at the HI DOH office? That classmate holds the
same views about this as you ?
That’s the one.
Ender Wiggins ... it doesn't appear that you're one of us .. here at Free Republic.
"Therefore, we wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states and organizations that are believed to present a clear threat to our freedom or national security.
We support our military, our troops and our Commander-in-Chief and we oppose turning control of our government back over to the liberals and socialists who favor appeasement, weakness, and subserviency.
We do not believe in surrendering to the terrorists as France, Germany, Russia and Spain have done and as Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton and the Democrats, et al, are proposing.
As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America.
We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.
We also oppose the United Nations or any other world government body that may attempt to impose its will or rule over our sovereign nation and sovereign people.
We believe in defending our borders, our Constitution and our national sovereignty."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.