Posted on 02/23/2010 8:02:16 AM PST by butterdezillion
Re: “I don’t understand why they never mention the Republican Governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle. Surely she could help.”
No. She can’t.
The Republican Party is complicit in Obama’s coup d’etat.
They became a party to the conspiracy, and the Democrats compromised the Republican candidate when Leahy and company “resolved” that John McCain was/is a “natural born” citizen. He isn’t, and was/is equally ineligible to serve as CiC.
They neutered McCain who never said a word about Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Alice Palmer, and the rest of the communists, socialists, black nationalists, and other assorted dirtbags that form Obama’s closest and longest lasting relationships and associations.
Most members of Congress are attorneys. The judges too. They all studied the Constitution. They know the law (at least enough to pass the bar).
They know Obama is ineligible, but they made a deal with the devil and now have to live with it.
She has. She’s confirmed Obama was born in Hawaii. Problem is, nobody is listening.
parsy, who listens...
AFTER-birthers is more accurate, first we had the birthers, then those who attacked the birthers came about, so hence they are AFTER-birthers.
Thats why they will all get voted out of office...hey maybe they have room for them in the unemployment lines...so they can get some of those gubment benifits they voted for...
Suitable or Constitutionally Eligible? CE is more inline with our current problem.
But yes since there is no more honor in the United States we must now do by law and mandate what honorable people used to by their own personal ethics.
Parsy, Lingle has confirmed nothing.
Okubo has confirmed the Factcheck COLB is a forgery.
And Fukino has confirmed that they have to look at 2 or more vital records for Obama’s birth before they can come up with a statement that he was born in Hawaii. According to Hawaii law, that means that Hawaii does NOT VOUCH for the accuracy of what’s on those records.
The Hawaii AG’s office refuses to say whether Fukino’s statement was legal. I suspect it’s because they know it’s not - because Fukino is not allowed to make such a disclosure, AND because she cannot legally conclude what she did about his birthplace because Obama has never presented his birth records as evidence to her or anybody else.
“Violation of the Constitution concerning the highest office in the land always matters. “
Amen, brother!
That would cover every record Obama has no word from Soros.
the State Department has stated in response to a FOIA request that they do not have a U.S. Passport application on file for Barack H. Obama," he explained. (berg)
-The birth certificate ,I assume ,would have been needed for US passport.
Exactly. And the fact that Obama’s lawyers referred to the Factcheck COLB ties them to the forgery. The Hawaii DOH including a link to the Factcheck forgery seems to be an endorsement of the forgery as well, which should get them in a whole heap of trouble.
The Fight the Smears COLB is also a forgery - posted on Obama’s own website. It doesn’t have the certificate number on it, but it also doesn’t have note of the amendment.
By June of 2007 Obama had already amended his birth certificate. Why did he use somebody else’s? It would have been easier to just delete the note of the amendment off of his own.
I’m really wondering if Obama CAN’T get a COLB because his birth certificate has a void flag. I asked Okubo for a blank form that they use for COLB’s which don’t meet the standard to be prima facie evidence. Here’s that exchange:
I said: “This form for an abbreviated copy of a birth certificate has the “prima facie” statement on it. Please send a blank voided copy of both the standard copy and abbreviated copy form used when a certificate no longer qualifies as prima facie evidence - such as amended or delayed birth certificates.”
She responded: “A redacted birth certificate is attached. There are no other records responsive to your request.”
I’m wondering if his certificate was ever given a number and whether - even if it has a number now - it can be printed as a COLB since it doesn’t qualify as prima facie evidence.
Either she is saying that they give the same birth certificate regardless of whether the certificate is legally void, OR that they won’t print a COLB at all if the certificate is legally void.
How do you guys read her response?
You didn’t answer my question. Who would do it?
Wow. Just wow.
This thing is ready to break open.
Think the MSM will ever do an accurate report on it?
Page 231 contains the requirements for "Race and color." "Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and "other nonwhite."
No classification for "African" as listed on Obama COLB
from steady drip link
At the rate it’s going it will be 100 years before we find out.
Is there anyway to tell if his navel is original equipment?
RIGHT ON!
Nice job!
You did it!!!!!!!!!
On my Long form BC it has two boxes (box 11b “Date received by local Registrar” and box 11c “Date Accepted by the state”), on mine they both have a hand stamp (meaning a stamp held in someone’s hand where dials are turned to give the correct date, yes old school style) both of which read Aug 14 1969.
My birthday is Aug. 7th 1969. in box 10a there is the “Certifier signature”, the Dr. who delivered me, Dr. Moncur MD in this case. He certified my live birth on Aug 13th 1969, which is hand written out with the same pen that the Dr. signed his name (box 10a) with in box 10b (the date).
On my computer printed COLB it states:” DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR August 14, 1969”
I was born in Honolulu Hawaii, and so the “date received by local registrar”, “date accepted by the state” and “date filed by the registrar” are all the same date, Aug 14 1969. My Certificate was signed by the Dr the day before (Aug 13 1969), sent to the Honolulu office the next day (Aug 14 1969).
This story adds up perfectly.
Upon calling the DOH and asking what the difference between “filed by” and “accepted” on meant, I was told that they meant the same thing. The same story they gave Misstickley. Which is a true story, they just left out the fact that on the outer islands the date that a record is accepted by the state and the day it gets an actual FILE number in Honolulu could easily have been different.
She has done it, the Posted COLB on FactCheck etc is with certainty a forgery.
From the website -
The criminal justice system in this country CAN stop Obama. It requires the right “legal team” and court to do it. Once Obama is exposed for the fraud that he is our Nation can heal its wounds and move on. Obama can no longer be allowed to “usurp” the supreme laws of our land!
Still doesn’t answer who would be the “right legal team” or “court”. Didn’t answer my question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.