And quote a single state's law that mandates the Secretary of State will check documents themselves? You can't, there are none. Every single state accepts the candidates from the two major parties unquestioned. And of the challenges you mentioned were made on minor party candidates which are held to a different standard.
I am advocating passing laws requiring more than Nancy Pelosi’s signature to claim elegibility, though we aren’t even sure the version of the Nominee Declaration sent to the states did even that.
Sure you are.
You, OTOH, are an Obama chinslurp.
As inaccurate claim, as your stuff usually is.
I see, Chinslurp. They can take the time to look at the records for 3rd party candidates, but will trust Nancy Pelosi when it comes to major parties? With morons like that in the positions of SOS, no wonder we are in the mess we’re in.
So yes, we’ll pass laws telling the SOS’s to do their f***** jobs properly.
In the meantime, it is 2009, with 3 years left on the maxist quisling’s fraudulent first term. And you want him to finish that term. Look up chinslurp in the dictionary, and you’ll find your photo.
Here's a few examples of what was done in Cal.
In 1968 the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for president, and then-Secretary of State Frank Jordan "found that, according to Mr. Cleaver's birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the 35 years of age needed to be on the ballot as a candidate for president."
USJF explained that "using his administrative powers, Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Mr. Cleaver unsuccessfully challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California, and, later, to the Supreme Court of the United States."
The USJF said similarly, in 1984, Peace and Freedom Party candidate Larry Holmes was removed from the ballot.
Even in the 2008 campaign, foreign-born third-party candidate Roger Calero was removed from ballots in some states, according to elections reports.
Obama, meanwhile, has refused to document his U.S. citizenship and, therefore, his eligibility to be president under the Constitution's requirement for a "natural born" citizen, his challengers say.
It is my observation coupled with what you said on this thread that you are now juts having fun. You're having fun is disengenuous and tiresome when many of of us are seeking the truth. On this issue you are just flat out wrong, as the examples indicate. The secretaries of state have the reposibility to ensure that the candidates on the ballot are qualified. The fact that they let the parties fill out a form and have the candidate's sign it does not mean they don't have the authority to do more; again as the examples illustrate. Also, they have done this with numerous state candidates. You continue to confusde current practice with the responsib9lity and power to enforce the constitution; an oath taken by the congress, the USSC, and the secretaries of state in each state. The only way to do that on this issue is to require the birth certificate and supporting documents. The fact that they didn't just indicates that they possibly allowed someone to commit the biggest fraud in the history of the country. A crime you don't seem to care about.
Class is over again. I won't waste any more time on you tonight.