Hey, “noob”. Welcome to FR.
It’s generally considered good form to read the article before blowing it off, especially when you’re a “noob” and just jump into a crevo debate with both feet like that.
Not an auspicious start to crevo debates.
I did read the article. Pure twaddle as I stated up thread. If you knew any science at all you would have to agree.
Here is some advice - and it’s free:
Buy any basic (mainstream university) biology 101 text book and read it with an open mind.
Thanks for the welcome - I think..
Not an auspicious start to crevo debates.
Actually I did not sign up here to debate evolution in general. And I did not jump in with both feet. Like any other thread, I am adding to the conversation. Such as when a poster was wrong about nuclear devices:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2306884/posts?page=43#43
“An atomic bomb is a nuclear device. It is a pure fission weapon (splitting of heavy nucleotides such as Uranium or Plutonium releasing energy) as opposed to a fusion weapon which fuses lighter nucleotides together releasing energy (thermonuclear device). Note: thermonuclear devices use a fission trigger (atomic bomb you might say) to overcome the curve of binding energy to enable fusion.
OTOH, they may be referring to a simple dirty bomb which just spreads radioactive debris. However, that is not a very effective device (i.e., bang for the buck - pun intended)”