Posted on 08/09/2009 8:10:48 PM PDT by Gordon Greene
That’s funny... it annoys me when someone is funny with so few words when it takes me so many to be occasionally slightly amusing (by accident..
if the reader is stoned).
Because you’ve demonstrated interest in issues involving Darwin’s ideas. Why did you respond so keenly? Why didn’t you just tell me to bug off, or ignore the ping? If I’ve annoyed you with an unwanted intrusion, I apologize. I’ll try to avoid a repeat.
Okay. Why did you ping me to this article?
“Okay. Why did you ping me to this article?”
Brrr...
That was cold... I always did consider you one of the smart ones, though.
I understand we have a difference of opinion, but I got that you don’t like Darwin a long time ago.
I know... I wasn’t the one that summoned the spirit of pooh.
My comment was only meant to amuse, not offend. Evolutionists are allowed to joke with Creationists now and again are they not? I’m not sure of your rules.
“Getting into the SBR is not the problem. How in the heck do I get out of here?”Just click here and follow the instructions ;-)
Humor is not only allowed, it’s going to be necessary if we’re going to maintain the cohesion necessary to stand against the common enemy.
Thank you for the dose of common sense I needed this morning... Way too much at stake to lose sight of the goal.
GG
The Founders had their disagreements over religions philosophy and doctrines too. They put those disagreements aside when it came time to get down to the business of government. I try to do the same.
Way to harangue a person.
If you're so bent out of shape about being pinged to this thread and having your time wasted, why are you still here harassing someone about it?
If you don't like it, leave already.
What’s it to you?
On the contrary, however, you’ve not answered my questions on this subject: If you found my ping so objectionable, why did you answer, or in answering simply tell me to bug off? Why did you reply, extensively and repeatedly, before discovering how objectionable you initially found my ping to be?
I thought my initial repy would have conveyed my opinion. You apparently took that as a challenge, and decided you needed to have the last word.
An accusation of Nazism couched in terms giving you plausible deniability and allowing you to escape responsibility should you be challenged. Speaking of which:
”You apparently took that as a challenge, and decided you needed to have the last word.”
As I recall ( see #63) I thanked you for your support. But, you couldn’t let that stand, so (tally-ho!) we were off and running. You’ve made it obvious your tardy complaint of an unsolicited ping is nothing more to you than another debating tactic.
Apology withdrawn.
Oh, gee!
You ping me to an article comparing Darwin to Hitler and tell me I'm making "accusatations of Nazism". Who could have seen that coming?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.