Replies

Corsi and Farrah cannot be as stupid and sloppy as they would have to be to have made those mistaken conclusions. That leaves prevarication. By the way, it is not just Corsi because Farah was responsible for an article with bad info on the Orly document.

I do have a frame of reference on Farah that not everyone has. I used to be closely involved with a conservative news and opinion web site. Without getting bogged down in details, I'll just say that JF does not get overly hung up on scruples in the way he runs his site and the way he gets his news. And this is another reason I vote for “lies” versus incompetence.

I'm going to make a list of reasons they would lie and I'll try very hard to come up with one or more that don't speak to the bottom line ($) in some way.

1. Your reason, Obama Researcher, to get the price of the Smith document down. ($$$)
2. To extend the whole birth certificate matter and their “Where's the Birth Cert.” campaign which I'll wager has improved their traffic and overall visibility. ($$$)
3. They are getting paid by the other side to get people off the track of the real documents. This would also help with #2 and #1. ($$$)
4. They are being threatened or someone is and they are cooperating to keep someone from being harmed. (no $)
5. They are working on a bigger story that encompasses these documents and the people involved with them and are deliberately being misleading to keep the hounds at bay long enough to get it put together. (this is no $ now but will lead to big $$$ if they succeed)
6. They are cooperating covertly with some alphabet people. (no $)
7. They want to ride the bc train for all it is worth but at the same time want to mitigate their categorization as “birthers” in the worst sense of the term. ($$$ - site traffic but not dropped by advertisers for being nutballs)

If you believe they are fully aware that their facts are wrong, you also have to believe that the reason is serious or involves serious money. The hit to their credibility is severe if not widely known. Should the truth come out elsewhere in a credible manner, it WILL be widely known. So it is potentially very serious.

The truth is just as Obama Researcher said - the docs have not been ruled out and the Orly doc was put through the ringer big time here. The Aussie doc is the fake. The existence of the hospital has been proved (slight name change is all) kahunah and you did it again. The Corsi article about the Smith document is really out to lunch as most of the other points on his list are nonstarters as well.

Anybody want to argue these points or fill in any that are missing? For my part, I hope WND’s reason is one or more of the nobler ones above because if not they are being very self-serving. Yes, that's their normal mode, but in this case it works against the country and I find it to be particularly reprehensible.