[Seizethecarp]

Corsi’s claim to rely on denials from Kenya is ludicrous and the other points are weak and an Wiki says the date format is OK for what that's worth! While I still have concerns about the footprint's similarity to Ang’awa’s publication image, my first thought is that Corsi is trying to lower the price that Lucas Smith expects to receive by lowering the credibility of the document. Smith's priority is money, not revealing the truth, it seems to me. By declaring the document a fraud, WND is putting the squeeze on Smith to put up or shut up by submitting the document to WND without the $millions up front.

[hoosiermama]

Save the card with all three footprints to your pictures...I did. They are easy to enlarge and compare that way. The two on the sign have just been flipped from one picture. The second toe is longer than the big toe, and there are many indentures along the foot indicating folds.

OTOH the footprint on MR SMITH’s copy: the second toe is about even or shorter than the others. There is a definite cross behind the toes (that is not in the DRs card and there are fewer indentures on the outside edge.)

[Author2]

The footprint can easily be explained. It’s a Photocopy of a document. Photocopying will tend to distort or over ink figure/foot prints. The original doc’s image would not be a black and most likely show more of the friction ridges. High quality/resolution photocopiers are not standard fare for hospital.