[MHGinTN]

You spittle out, as if somekind of authority: "You accepted that, hook line and sinker. Do you know for a fact, that this image, at it’s base, is somehow a “forgery?” No, you don’t." Um, yes oabamnoid, I do know it was a forgery, a layering of data to build a jpg which lacked the raised seal identity of an authentic CoLB when enlarged to the max. And because this was caught by folks like Polarik, the subsequent images of the same forgery had added to them a visible raised seal. But the false date of June 2007 remained on all the earlier forgeries you seem to want FR to embrace! You've outed yourself, Obamanoid!

Odd that you revert to assassinating Polarik's character when you avoid the FACT that there was no raised seal on the forgery as first represented by Obam's website, Daily KOS, and factcheck.

Your loyalties are coming more into focus as you work stealthily to shore up the lies of Barry Soetoro and his henchghouls. Attack Polarik all you like, but his work in exposing the forgeries has been verified as accurate. That must really frost your obamanoid butt. ZDoes it show on your messiah's face when he's told of it?

[RegulatorCountry]

Now there's the MHGinTN I've come to know and love. Obamanoid, spittle ... what, no tinkle, lol?

Continue to spin your wheels on this matter, that can't prove anything if it's genuine, and can't prove anything if it's fake. The Obama campaign carefully kept it at arms' length, if you bothered to notice.

I'll continue to pursue the Constitutional angle, as far as Obama's eligibility for office. It's the only angle that matters.

For the benefit of unfamiliar FReepers and lurkers, posting history is available by clicking on the screen name, then clicking on "In Forum." You'll see no basis for MHGinTN's peculiar attack upon me. You will, however, see plenty of reason to suspect the "authority" that caught so many FReepers up in trying to "prove" the forgery of a JPEG that has no probative value.