What I think, is that I’m sick of the diversion, of he said, she said, and only want to deal with demonstrable facts or plausible scenarios backed by facts. I’m also sick of incompetent attorneys.
This thread lives on because of interesting commentary, having nothing to do with Ms. Taitz. In my own opinion, she’s at best a well-meaning but utterly unprepared and unfortunate “queen” of the “birthers.” At worst, she’s deliberately discrediting efforts to press the eligibility matter.
That’s what I think. Since you asked.
I agree with you.
While all the supposition and scenarios are interesting, facts alone will expose this imposter.
For clarity, we need a list of known, provable facts, no theories.
I will start it:
1) A baby of mixed-race was born approximately 48 years ago.