The Perkins firm had better have been thorough because if Obama goes down, the firm will be right behind him for obstructing justice. They really have no legitimate basis for defending this man with respect to his affirmative obligation to establish his eligibility for POTUS. Invariably it will be the little things that they overlooked that will tag them.
No.
Even the vilest offenders are entitled to confidential and professional legal representation. That’s the American way. Attorneys are bound by ethics and law to defend their clients and work for them in good faith.
A legal firm representing a guilty client isn’t obstructing justice. It’s just performing a difficult job as provided by our laws.