Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: mojitojoe
The Perkins firm which serves as Obama’s primary lawyers at this point, is based in Seattle. Lawyers there will know how to locate real data. __________________ How convenient. They can locate or *fix* real data.

I didn't in any way mean to imply that.

At present, subject to new information, I am convinced beyond much room for doubt that Crosi's proposition that places her in Seattle on Saturday, August 19, attending classes is wrong.

I am not the only guy who knows the facts who has interest in the case. Last I recall, two of my Law School classmates who were also there at the same time were still of counsel at Perkins. Either one of them sees Corsi's statement will know he is wrong and that they have an interest in refuting him.

I don't. I want to support WND--if Corsi really manages to get his neck further out on this proposition, I am all for him and will do whatever I can to sustain his position.

Perkins is hired by Obama to advance his marker and they will do that as effectively as they can as I would on the other side.

9,204 posted on 08/14/2009 10:42:28 AM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9197 | View Replies ]


To: David

I don’t trust Perkin’s one bit. They would do whatever they had to do or were paid to do to cover up. Attorneys ethical? What a joke, especially with the stakes this high. That is exactly why 99% of the investigating and the results are never posted on the forum and go on behind the scenes via emails, FReepmails, telephone, etc.
I think it’s only a matter of time. The evidence is mounting fast.


9,248 posted on 08/14/2009 2:35:18 PM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9204 | View Replies ]

To: David

Based on his submission of this footnote to the federal court in January, I am surmising that the strongest evidence BO could have provided to NP to verify his Constitutional status before she Certified his eligibility for POTUS on August 27; was this same APFC characterization of authenticity. BUT THE STRONGEST EVIDENCE HE HAD TO PROVE TO THE COURT HE WAS A NBC; WAS THAT CERTIFICATION OF NOMINATION NP SIGNED AND FORWARDED TO STATE ELECTIONS OFFICIALS SO THAT HIS NAME COULD BE PRINTED ON THE STATE GENERAL ELECTION BALLOTS! This begs the question: why did lawyers from PERKINS COIE ask the court to take judicial notice their client was for real by referencing a web site run by the organization APFC, given that they could have cited his authentication as a natural born citizen in any one of the 50 Official DNC Certifications of Nomination sworn to by the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives?

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2009/08/09/rumors-lies-and-unsubstantiated-facts/


9,287 posted on 08/14/2009 6:19:06 PM PDT by mojitojoe (All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9204 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson