Here’s my latest thoughts...over the past few days...If you have any additions let me know.
The heat may pop the corn.
Thoughts:
Contributions from: BP2; Pissant; Shield ; Unspun
RE in which the BO administration is investigating the CIA: They forgot their own rule (don’t go after institutions):
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
OTOH Here are my thoughts with this article added. I’ve been trying to make sense of it all for a couple of days: (any contribution is appreciated)
THOUGHTS::
A. BO is scrubbing documents.
B. BO cannot be certain that he has scrubbed EVERY document: every copy of his BC etc etc etc. (AND there is No doubt that he has tried. He’s hiding something)
C. Who’s to say that the FBI/CIA/Interpol isn’t involved in this?
1. Bush cooperated (See Canadian recent news or radio program) maybe at their requests.
2. Bill Clinton recently visits CIA (takes trip to Korea—Freepers notice BO body language is negative and WJC return with girls.
D. Pissant downloaded a large number of articles re: the BC right before the “fake one” came out. (Remember thinking when there’s a lot of flack, we’re over the target: Something was going to happen and it did.) Timing suspect.
1. Orley document asked to be authenticated and others created that were soon proven false.
2. Orley’s website compromised (Soro’s son on Google board)
a. A web-obot said he created Orley’s document.
b. BP2 shows how pictures of web-obot are not like Orley’s (Maiden/ stain)
E. The Canadian Press wrote an article about how information was being suppressed way back to before the election because talking heads had been threatened if they mentioned the BC. They said they had documentation/proof. They promised more information would soon be released. Radio broadcast named networks and said Bush had cooperated. Traced much to Soros and Company (including BO)
1. If false information it looks like bait to me...Come and get it the guys in Red have the place covered)
2. If true Obama is desperate (and dangerous and crazily deceitful)
3. Net works named have remained quiet and have not responded to the Canadian “news”
4. Dobbs is reporting on BC. Making it an question of openness.
F. Neither D or E could have been accomplished by some kid in his parents basement (Forgery yes but coordinating all those media outlets, NO. Particularly because they were each different: not from talking points)
G. Bo would have that power. He would have no reason of knowing if a document given to Orley was authentic or not, unless he/his minions faked it himself.
1: If he thought there was any possibility it was authentic, he’d be searching just like us.
2: He’d try to destroy it and Orly if he thought it was real. Act immediately.
3: IF he faked it himself, he’d wait until Orly was actually in court to expose her.....Let the authenticators expose her.
(What happened?...You chose)
H . If he didn’t know it was authentic and HE didn’t set it up; than the only others with the power would be the CIA, FBI etc. They could be setting up a “sting” operation with the Canadian news as bait or Orley’s BC as bait or both...Goal is more than exposing then BO’s BC, Something bigger...much bigger.
1: What purpose would BO have in attacking the CIA (He’s not going after Bush)
a. Nanzi tried to “ridicule their work”
b. Holden is Minimilizing them.
c. Rats in congress have criticized them.
Are they attempting to use step twelve against the CIA?
Risky for him unless:
He can turn it around on them and say they are getting back at him when their information is released?
OR:
I. Are foreign powers (investigators) involved?
a. Isreal? Has he been retaliating for their involvement?
b. Great Britain? It would explain the snub of the queen.
c. Hillary seems to attack BO ‘s cousins (that he campaigned for) in her visit to Kenya
d. Bill Clinton recently visit CIA/Penneta
J. Various names, addresses and social security number have been linked to BO.
Too many to list and too varied to be normal
a. People with numerous names and social security numbers fall into three categories: 1. Criminals 2. covert operatives of governments
K. Obama’s numbers are dropping.
1. He’s call his thugs out
2. He attacks police (uses race card)
3. Globe article is targeting his constitutes.
"BO body language is negative" -- what does this mean?
"K.3. Globe article is targeting his constitutes."
I bought and read this issue of the Globe and read the article. I am heartened to say that I am seeing this issue prominently displayed in news racks in local drugstores and grocery stores: no one is hiding it behind anything else.
The Globe's article emphasizes a Canadian birthplace.
Good morning, hoosiermama.
I hope you had a good sleep.
Thank you for post #8,587. That is a wonderful post.
My head is spinning.
E. The Canadian Press wrote an article about how information was being suppressed way back to before the election because talking heads had been threatened if they mentioned the BC. They said they had documentation/proof. They promised more information would soon be released. Radio broadcast named networks and said Bush had cooperated. Traced much to Soros and Company (including BO)
hoosiermama - I missed the above, would you please explain?