Actually, “natural born” is not determined by the 14th Amendment (note that the words in the 14th amendment say, persons born in the US are “citizens”, not “natural born citizens”.) There is a difference- the constitution is very precise in its wording.
Reading this will help:
http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/natural-born-citizen-us-constitution-kerchner-update-august-6-2009-founding-fathers-obama-not-natural-born-citizen/
That pretty much clears it up for me, so isn’t the Ortiz move “moot”? because all she is trying to prove is that Obama is ineligible to be President and therefore is not officially the President of the United States. This would seem to be rather cut and dry to me, but I am not a Constitutional scholar by any means.
remember that he declared himself to be a natural born citizen— he signed himself that he was natural born