[newfreep]

New thread suggesting the Dr. Taitz BC is a fraud.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2309830/posts

WND also reporting possible fake here:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106135

SO back to square one?

[rxsid]

"New thread suggesting the Dr. Taitz BC is a fraud. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2309830/posts"

The "new" images are a fake. Just have a look at the smear/smudge mark on the originally posted Dr. Taitz doc. The "new" image shows a smudge mark that is clearly in the wrong location on the page, and furthermore is wrong in color/intensity.

"WND also reporting possible fake here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106135"

Not sure comparing a 1961 doc to a 1964 doc is proof of anything. Especially since that country went through massive changes during that time frame (almost certainly including their gov't docs).

"SO back to square one?"
Based on the above, I would say no.