Scholars don't have anything to do with the legality of the matter unless they exert some sort of influence through an amicus brief or soemthing, Mojave, and even then their role is peripheral. Their opinions, learned though they may be, do not carry the weight of law, let alone Constitutionality. And, Edwin Meese, nice guy, loyal to Reagan and a fine Attorney General. But, even he never had the authority to amend the Constitution, or to dictate any legal interpretation of the terms pertaining to eligibility for the office of President.
So, this game of gotcha isn't quite working out for you. Maybe you can argue from the facts of the matter. There are differing schools of thought, and you do not belong to the same school as I do, clearly. Trying to tar me with wild claims of attacking Ed Meese is just pointless mudslinging.
Good night.
So, this game of gotcha isn't quite working out for you. Maybe you can argue from the facts of the matter.This coming from a poster who has produced nothing but empty assertions. Too funny.
Meese and the Heritage Foundation scholars trump your Obama as a "constitutional scholar" card.