Orly Taitz wrote an update today in which she stated:
“More then one person had certified copies of this document.”
She is the only one, besides the person(s) from whom she got this document, who can disclose the “chain of custody”. Hopefully she will be able to do that at the appropriate time, but she may not as IIRC the source wishes to remain anonymous (understandable but regrettable).
As someone has already told you, there are verifiable reasons why this document could have been requested from Kenya and people on this forum pointed them out. If you had read the thread you would know that you are a bit late suggesting that it was done by someone in the family.
If you had done some reading here before deciding to participate you would know that the people you refer to as birthers have so far tried very hard to dispute the legitimacy of this document with remarkable skill and integrity and have yet to be able to do so. You have mischaracterized their efforts 100%.
I’m not sure the provenance will be so important if it is proved that the birth entry in the Kenyan registry matches this document - almost makes it moot.
The ignorance you have demonstrated in your posts makes you moot, too.
I need to do no research to understand than any document, in order to have the least bit of legitimacy has to have a tracked origin.
Any discussion of the contents of the doc are irrelevant and illegitimate if you can't establish the parentage.
To all of you:
Get the horse in front of the cart....
The only reason Orley has petitioned the court is to establish a Chain of Possession between the origin of the documentation and it's appearance in court as evidence.
Only documentation that has this criteria established are allowed to be presented in a court of law.
There may be hundreds of copies, butare no good unless they meet this criteria to be evidential.