And I see your on a State Law thread that is being covered intensely by the media and heard by the courts, like the BC issue and thread your on now?
LOL, troll
Well..., it is a very puzzling thing when posters here say that they want to see the birth certificate — and yet — those very same posters don’t want to work for a state law...
I think it’s because that many are ignoring the *cause* of why people here don’t have the birth certificate. The reason why is that there is *no legal requirement* for a candidate to show their birth certificate. That’s why over a year of court cases have gotten nowhere. That’s why all the posting and everything (news shows, articles, radio programs, TV programs, etc. and etc.) have gotten nowhere in terms of producing the birth certificate.
It seems that a very large majority of the posters on the birth certificate issue *miss* the fact that there is *no legal requirement* for a candidate to produce their birth certificate.
NOW..., I figure *once* these people figure out the *reason* for why they can’t get the birth certificate — it only follows naturally that all one has to do is get a state law that makes it a *legal requirement* for a candidate to show his birth certificate or else he cannot be on the ballot.
HOWEVER, I see that many prefer to post about it and never do anything about it — like get that state law going.
Already there are the states of Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri and Arizona who have started this process. I can’t speak to Texas, Missouri and Arizona, so others are going to have to say something here about those states. But, I can say that in Oklahoma, it was placed as a House Bill, got out of Committee, passed the House, went to the Senate and was killed in the Senate. So, we’re going to go at it again, next session.
Now, once that’s in place for 2012, then a candidate cannot be placed on the ballot in that state — unless — they show their birth certificate — a perfect solution to the problem... :-)