Replies

I don’t know what conclusion y’all have come to on this (I don’t have time to read through 6,500 posts), and maybe (with a 22” 2048x1536 screen) I have the advantage over some of you, but having zoomed in so that the document overspreads the width of its window, distortions show up (around the included text) that make this photograph very plainly suspicious. One should also wonder why, if the document has not been faked by the “photographer”, a flatbed scan was not provided instead of this photograph taken at such a sharp angle from the vertical. Flocking to such things only hurts the cause—and further ridicules the reputation of—the Birthers.

One should also wonder why, if the document has not been faked by the “photographer”, a flatbed scan was not provided instead of this photograph taken at such a sharp angle from the vertical.

Yep, that's my take as well. Also the 47044 - whoever went to all this effort in the end wanted to embarrass us Constitutionalists that we would go for it. Of course, I could be wrong but that's my take . . .

If you don’t have time to read any of the posts, you should not take the time to post idiocy.