Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: snowsislander




吃驚さん 、my point is that A4 size paper seems anachronistic: I don't believe that a 1964 Australian government document, as the Bomford original purports to be, would have been printed on A4 paper. I don't think Australia adopted the use of A4 paper until the 1970s.






When the paper was scanned (File Modification Date/Time : 2007:06:05 07:15:37-04:00), it didn't cross the person's mind to change the paper size (option) when it was scanned; or it could have been the default of their LEADTECH software/installation/computer. Don't quote me on any of this, of course.
6,443 posted on 08/04/2009 5:13:05 PM PDT by Bikkuri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6421 | View Replies ]


To: Bikkuri
"When the paper was scanned (File Modification Date/Time : 2007:06:05 07:15:37-04:00)"

I would add, when the paper was allegedly scanned. As we know, timestamps can be "falsified" as well.

6,457 posted on 08/04/2009 5:23:10 PM PDT by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6443 | View Replies ]

To: Bikkuri

http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html

does this site show Australia went to A4 in 1974?

(three days of this and I’m going blind!)


6,465 posted on 08/04/2009 5:30:56 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6443 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson