Very good ...my initial impression was that the Bromford doc looked fake ...just a gut reaction ...but I have been all over the map on this
I wasn’t sure at first, so I downloaded and magnified parts of it. Especially the folded areas.
Not only are the letters faded, but they seem to be proportionally spaced across the folded area instead of ‘curved’ or ‘bent’ to match the folds.
I thought it looked fake too, but how was it created? There are similarities and differences both in the "typewritten" text and in the "pre-printed" text of the two documents, and the paper texture is markedly different.
If the Bomford creator started with only the Taitz document or vice versa, we are looking at the product of some serious Photoshop or Gimp skills. Adding creases and folds is easy in Photoshop, but removing them without disturbing the affected text? If the Taitz document came from the Bomford, how were the vertical lines in the textured paper removed so cleanly?
If both documents were created from scratch from the same template, then these differences are easily explained. The forger could have just printed the basic form onto different types of paper, filled in each form with a different old typewriter, then folded away.
Is that what happened? The mystery continues.