Looks like the “original” may be a fake, too.
See
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg.
Someone posted this elsewhere:
I wanted to see if I could find any images of similar documents from Kenya around the same time period that could be compared to the certificate on the web. I spent several hours with Google image search on that before I decided to broaden my search outside of Kenya-specific documents.
It was some time later that I finally spotted a thumbnail on one of the results pages that looked very much like the Kenyan certificate. I pulled up the full size image and found that it was virtually EXACTLY the same type of document.
It was a scanned image of a “Certified Copy of Registration of Birth” dated in 1964 for a David Jeffrey Bomford on a genealogy website for the Bomford family. Except that David Jeffrey Bomford wasn’t born in Kenya, he was born in South Australia. But what was even more interesting was certain other features of the document as compared to the Kenya certificate.
The names of the registrar and the district registrar were the SAME NAMES as given in the Kenya certificate save for the first initials, i.e. G.H. Lavender and J.H. Miller in the Bomford document versus E.H. Lavender and M.H. Miller in the Kenya document.
Also, the book number (44B) and page number (5733) were the exactly the same on both documents.
The image of the Bomford certificate seems to prove beyond any doubt that not only is the Kenya certificate a fake, but that whomever faked it used the Bomford certificate as the template.
The image of the Bomford certificate seems to prove beyond any doubt that not only is the Kenya certificate a fake, but that whomever faked it used the Bomford certificate as the template.It doesn't prove anything. I might just indicate someone created the Bomford certificate to cast doubt on the Obama certificate.
-- Technical Editor
The whole matter is really very simple. Either the "Book" number and the "Page" number on the Kenyan birth certificate point to an entry for a "Barack Obama" in the official Kenyan birth Register or they don't.
Any thing else is just spin being offered to promote one's agenda, whatever that may be.
how about posting a link to the Bomford page,so we can all make the determination?
I think that seals it. Damn Damn Damn.
Game over.
Wait a minute!!
I just clicked on properties on that Bombard pic.
It says CREATED 08/03/2009???
Wait a minute!!
I just clicked on properties on that Bombard pic.
It says CREATED 08/03/2009???
So this just coincedentally uploads his birth certificate to his website TODAY???
Not quite that fast. Both were British territories/affiliated during those years. British ministries may well have standardized the format of the forms for use across the empire at that time. The same format may well have been carried forward (why reinvent the wheel).
Maybe all files say today’s date. Don’t know. Can you inform me Technical Editor? You sound more...technical than me.
1) There is no Taylors Road but there is a Taylors Lane in Thebarton, South Australia.
2) I cannot find a Community Hospital there. Could it have been renamed?
The names, book number and page number are just too much of a coincidence to be believable. So either the Bomford or the Kenya BC must be a fake. Make your bets but it looks to me like the Kenya BC is DOA unless someone can show that the Bomford is a fake.
If it turns out that the Kenya BC is the fake then Technical Editor and the World Class FR Investigative Web Research Team will deserve the credit for chasing it down. Nothing wrong with that. We search for the truth on this forum and that is the way it is supposed to be.
So, do you get credit for finding this image, or Someone posting elsewhere?
The Bomford image also appears to be of an image of A4 paper, assuming that there is more cut off from the top than there was from the sides (which may or may not be a good assumption). However, from what I can see, Australia didn't adopt A4 as a standard size paper until the 1970s, whereas this document is supposedly from the early sixties.
If the Bomford image is legitimate and the Taitz image is derived from it, I have to wonder why a forger would change the hardest part by far (the folds are nowhere near a match), but wouldn't bother to change some of the simplest items such as the control numbers.
Be that as it may, the most important bits are the original file documents in a cabinet somewhere, not these derived certificates which merely serve as pointers to the original documents. Like the Hawaiian documents, what we need are the actual documentation, not just these certifications of those primary documents' existence.
Good work...by you to find that....
See
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images
/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg.
Someone posted this elsewhere:
Tried following the link; it now says:
Not Found
The requested URL /worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg was not found on this server.
Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Apache/1.3.39 Server at www.bomford.net Port 80
