To: BIGLOOK
Ignore the white version, somewhere in 4,000 posts a person did make a copy and they brightened it up, they apologized for not clarifying it more and allowing people like me to walk in and think, hmmm something isn’t right.
Anyway, I do believe this document is the real deal.
Its the Obama-breaker.
4,413 posted on
08/02/2009 9:33:10 PM PDT by
Eye of Unk
("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace." T. Paine)
To: Eye of Unk
I think it’s the other way around.
The lighter copy is the original from WND.
To: Eye of Unk
I mentioned earlier the fold lines which make it look as if it was once stuffed into an envelope. That little tear along the fold line is typical of aging documents. Now if some forensic team could obtain the authentic copy and date the paper to circa 1964, this thing will have traction.
I also previously wrote, there can not be a reason for forging a document in 1964 for a three year old kid.
4,435 posted on
08/02/2009 9:43:22 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson