I am going to say that we need to hold off on crying “smoking gun, smoking gun” until the experts who take a look at the document come back with a judgment, like what happened with the TANG documents.
If I recall correctly, didn’t someone in this thread say that this piece of paper was submitted to the court with the recommendation of the same typewriting expert that debunked the TANG documents?
If we can, wait and see what the typewriting expert has to say about it. Until then, and with some extra qualifications upon further research by others, this is unsubstantiated.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Notice of Electronic Filing
The following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 8/1/2009 at 10:08 PM PDT and filed on 8/1/2009
Case Name: Ambassador Alan Keyes PhD, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al
Case Number: 8:09-cv-82
Filer: Alan Keyes PhD
Document Number: 34
Docket Text:
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
(Attachments: # (1)
Appendix Photocopy of Obama’s birth certificate from Kenya)(Taitz, Orly)
8:09-cv-82 Notice has been electronically mailed to:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA david.dejute@usdoj.gov
Orly Taitz dr_taitz@yahoo.com
8:09-cv-82 Notice has been delivered by First Class U. S. Mail or by fax to: :
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
Document description: