He’s indeed not a troll and has done great work here at FR. However, this does not make him above question, nor does it make his opinion correct.
In fact, if one did not know better, his obtuse behavior on this thread would indicate a strong possibility that he was a troll. Fortunately, we know he’s not. He may even be right about this document. But the fact remains that nobody knows either way and to definitively state as he has that the document is fake, is sloppy reasoning to say the least.
This thread is moving very quickly, so either my posts have been deleted or I just can’t find them, but I have appologized for starting this troll speculation. Some of the dates being thrown around were incorrect. I appologize for offending anyone.