To: Danae
I suppose this is why Taitz is going to London. I have a question, How can Ron Polarik determine the validity of a Document from of SCANS of Documents. No one can tell if a given document is real or not from a Picture.Yes, but they can tell if it's FAKE.
I seem to recall that you have some personal knowledge of this little fact, don't you?
2,074 posted on
08/02/2009 11:08:22 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 194 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: null and void
Tell what is fake?
I could color photo copy a 100 dollar bill back it, take a picture of it, and you could not tell from the picture that it was fake. Though clearly it IS a fake.
You can’t prove much about any document from a PICTURE of it. You certainly can’t tell if it is real or fake. And REAL documents expert will tell you that. Hollywood could produce just about any document that they needed to and you would not be able to tell if it was fake with out an expert, and that expert would have to be actually holding the document to tell. Polarik might have gotten some things right, but he got a lot wrong as well, mostly because he isn’t a documents expert. He writes surveys and does Statistics.
2,097 posted on
08/02/2009 11:13:38 AM PDT by
Danae
(- Conservative does not equal Republican. Conservative does not compromise.)
To: null and void; LucyT; Kevmo; Fred Nerks
Whoever validates or discredits this document must do so having the authentic document in hand. All it would take is a simple test of the paper to determine if it was circa 1964. If confirmed, everything else would fall in place.
There can not have been a reason to produce a forgery in 1964 for a three year old kid.
2,138 posted on
08/02/2009 11:23:49 AM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson