[Munz]

>HOWEVER, if you look closely the Entry date is August 5th, 1961! In that day and age it would have been physically impossible to be in Hawaii on August 4th, 1961 and in Kenya on the 5th to Enter this document on the record. There were no faxes, email, or any other means to do such at that time. Most curious. This document is at least verifiable.<

I’m so sorry, but I’m really sleep deprived right now.
Can you summarize a bit differently so I can follow your logic please?

[politicalmerc]

HOWEVER, if you look closely the Entry date is August 5th, 1961! In that day and age it would have been physically impossible to be in Hawaii on August 4th, 1961 and in Kenya on the 5th to Enter this document on the record. There were no faxes, email, or any other means to do such at that time. Most curious. This document is at least verifiable>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I wrote that in the same sleep deprived condition!

If you look at the Certificate in the image the Date of Registration is about half way down and is indicated to be August 5th, 1961. If he was born in Hawaii on August 4th, 1961 how would his birth be registered in Kenya by the next day? Legal registration takes an original document. Faxes didn't really exist, teletype did but not for this purpose. You can't send a document over night even today to Kenya. You couldn't get on a plane and be there by the next day, and why would you try?

The only logical explanation is that, if this document is true, he was born in Kenya on August 4th, 1961 and the birth was registered the next day.

Make more sense now?