One ‘researcher’ acting on his own
Problem is access to two major universities
One ‘researcher’ with a good ‘team’ for backup
Access is not a problem
That’s just school records.
Now the same has to be done for all the other pieces of paper trail, the phone book, etc.
For something of this magnitude, it would take an “agency” ;(
The above is all paper, what about people, the university classmates of SADO’s?
I already posted two articles that totally contradict each other one or two pages back, did you read them?
Here's another example, see if you can work out how this came about:
~~~
Another class mate, Barbara Cannon Rusk, recalls visiting Stanley Ann Dunham and her baby son Barack at her apartment on Capitol Hill in Seattle shortly after the end of these spring quarter classes. (1962).
‘I had moved to Utah for a while after high school, and I came back to Seattle in the summer of 1962. I remember visiting the World’s Fair, and then stopping by Stanley Ann’s apartment on Capitol Hill. It was a small apartment, upstairs. It was after June, and could have been as late as September, 1962. I visited her for half a day or so. It was after the end of the spring quarter classes, and she wasn’t in classes, and didn’t have a job. I recall her being melancholy at the time. I had a sense that something wasn’t right in her marriage. It was all very mysterious. First, her husband wasn’t there, he was already off in Harvard. I didn’t ask her about the relationship, feeling it was a private matter. My daughter Michelle was just a few weeks younger than Stanley’s son, who she called Barry, and they played together on the floor.’
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sum 1962 — Sighting by John W. Hunt in June-Sept 1962
“I had moved to Utah for a while after high school, and I came back to Seattle in the summer of 1962. I remember visiting the World’s Fair, and then stopping by Stanley Ann’s apartment on Capitol Hill. It was a small apartment, upstairs. It was after June, and could have been as late as September, 1962. I visited her for half a day or so. It was after the end of the spring quarter classes, and she wasn’t in classes, and didn’t have a job. I recall her being melancholy at the time. I had a sense that something wasn’t right in her.”
~~~
You don't think they might have been reading from the same script by any chance?
Of course the source of the John Hunt story is no longer available...
AND THAT JOHN HUNT REFERENCE CAME FROM A PAGE OF THE OBAMA FILE:
Sum 1962 — Sighting by John W. Hunt in June-Sept 1962
— “I had moved to Utah for a while after high school, and I came back to Seattle in the summer of 1962. I remember visiting the World’s Fair, and then stopping by Stanley Ann’s apartment on Capitol Hill. It was a small apartment, upstairs. It was after June, and could have been as late as September, 1962. I visited her for half a day or so. It was after the end of the spring quarter classes, and she wasn’t in classes, and didn’t have a job. I recall her being melancholy at the time. I had a sense that something wasn’t right in her.”
http://servv89pn0aj.sn.sourcedns.com/~gbpprorg/obama/AnnasBeatnikPeriod.html
The two people who have supplied the most information about Ann Dunham are her two Mercer Island high school friends: Susan Botkin Blake and Maxine Box. The easiest way to understand their prevarications is to analyze the story they tell of Ann’s “visit” to Seattle. There are at least three versions:
Version I
In a March 27, 2007 video interview Blake said:
She came to visit briefly one afternoon in 1961 when Barry was just a few weeks old. We were sitting at my mom’s house one late August afternoon and she had just finished nursing her baby. She was patting him and she went ‘Oh, he pooped.’ She looked at me ‘cause I had two little baby brothers and she handed him to me and said here Botkin, you know how to do this so she handed him out so I changed Barry’s diaper and showed her how to do it, said get used to it, they do this a lot these new babies do[.]
Box last saw her friend in 1961, when she visited Seattle on her way from Honolulu to Massachusetts, where her then-husband was attending Harvard.
Author Michael Patrick Leahy interviewed both women for an article in August 2008:
On at least one occasion, very shortly after the birth of Barack Obama Junior, friends of Stanley Ann Dunham recall her visiting them in Seattle with her new born baby, Barack Obama Junior.
Blake recalls that Dunham, who was calling herself Ann Obama at the time, visited her at her house in Mercer Island during the last week of August 1961.
She left Honolulu just as soon as she had clearance from her doctor to travel with her new baby. He was just 3 weeks old....She was very excited about her new life, and her husband. She was nuts about him, crazy in love. I was under the impression that he had left Honolulu before Barack’s birth; that he had gone to Harvard already for his studies, and that Ann was on her way to join him there.
As with Blake, this visit would be the last time that Box ever saw her high school friend.
Blake’s and Box’s recollections agree with the fable in Dreams; Ann and Obama are madly in love, he is at Harvard, and a distressed wife and child are on their way to be with him. These recollections, however, are simply impossible. In reality, Ann Dunham wasn’t “visiting”; she was living in Seattle and attending school at the University of Washington. Ann couldn’t have been on her way to Harvard because no one, including Barack Obama, Sr., knew anything about Harvard until May of 1962. Yet Blake anchors the date of the visit to late August 1961 by referring to a young baby, “pink and very new,” “3 weeks old”; “I showed her how to do it [change diapers].” If we accept the president’s date of birth as August 4, 1961, then it is impossible for Blake not to be talking about 1961. Finally, how can Blake describe Ann as being “nuts about him, crazy in love,” when Ann had just left Obama Sr. back in Hawaii for good? The marriage (if indeed there was a marriage) didn’t fall apart “a few years later,” as Box stated; it had already fallen apart, as evidenced by Ann and baby moving to Seattle.
Version II
According to David Maraniss in an August 2008 Washington Post article, August 1961 was not the last time Blake and Box saw their friend Ann, as was stated in version I. In March of 2008, Washington Post reporter Michael Dobbs discovered that Obama Sr. didn’t learn he was accepted to Harvard until May of 1962. Could this be why Maraniss pins Ann’s “visit” to Seattle in late summer 1962?
Her husband finished his degree, graduating in June 1962 ... Then, before the month was out, he [Obama Sr.] took off, leaving behind his still-teenage wife and namesake child ... Did Ann try to follow him to Cambridge? Her friends from Mercer Island were left with that impression. Susan Botkin [Blake], Maxine Box and John Hunt all remember Ann showing up in Seattle late that summer with little Barry, as her son was called.
“She was on her way from her mother’s house to Boston to be with her husband,” Botkin [Blake] recalled. “[She said] he had transferred to grad school and she was going to join him ... but I remember that afternoon, sitting in my mother’s living room, drinking iced tea and eating sugar cookies. She had her baby and was talking about her husband, and what life held in store for her. She seemed so confident and self-assured and relaxed. She was leaving the next day to fly on to Boston.”
This second version of Ann’s “visit” is as impossible as the first. In late August 1962, Ann was not coming from her mother’s house in Hawaii; she was residing in Seattle. She had been in Seattle for at least a year and certainly had no intentions of “leaving the next day” to see her husband in Boston. Though this second version gets rid of the problem of when Obama Sr. learned of Harvard and when he went there, it is total hogwash.
Version III
Four years after his 2008 article, Maraniss wrote his book, Barack Obama: The Story. The incontrovertible fact that Ann was in Seattle by August of 1961 forced him to change the date of the “visit” back to 1961 while keeping many of the details the same:
Barry was not yet a month old when they left Honolulu in late August 1961 ... And she [Ann] made her way over to Susan Botkin’s mother’s house with the baby and spent an afternoon there ... they sat in the living room, drinking iced tea and eating sugar cookies, as Ann cradled baby Barry ... She looked neither frightened nor intimidated, but rather “so confident and self-assured and relaxed. She nursed him and was burping him, and oh, he pooped, and she handed him to me — ‘Here, Botke.’”
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/we_have_been_duped_the_story.html#ixzz2QluANHBw
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/we_have_been_duped_the_story.html
Not just the classmates. The profs, the TAs & the administrators at two different universities wd all have to keep an oath of silence. Not one cd ever say, ‘The transcript shows SADO was in one of my classes which she never attended’, or ‘The transcript shows SADO wasn’t in one of my classes which she completed, & for which she originally received a grade. Who changed the records, & why?’
That’s just too many people, for not even one ever to notice the first two yrs of the transcript had been completely reworked. [Oh, & reworked so as to make Obama’s Dreams narrative out to be a lie. No, the lib profs, etc., wd not have gone along w this.]
You’re right, and I have always maintained it would take a TEAM who were devoted to the research, our group tried to achieve something like that, but working on the web through nothing more than the facility of correspondence and the compilation of a dossier (which we have located on a private site not in the US) and this is the source of much of what I write. There were nine, sometimes up to 12 of us who collected information, read articles, hunted down sources. And none of us did it for a reward or any other reason than looking for kernels of truth in the maze of lies.
That we reached conclusions that are not mainstream as a result, isn’t surprising. Is it?
Has anyone else made any sense of the millions of lies it took to create the myth, and to cover over the cracks that appeared later?