Last I heard, it wasn’t illegal to tell lies, so her schoolfriends and various classmates are safe, and there have been no transcripts from Hawaii U for a start, just a letter confirming that Stanley Ann Dunham was enrolled from the Fall of 1960.
If that student was Ann S Obama listed in the Honolulu Polk for 1961, and if that student only attended for a short while, the author could be forgiven for assuming Ann S Obama was Stanley Ann Dunham, for hasn’t the whole world been told she married the kenyan student?
As for the rest of it, don’t look to me for any legal action, I’m an Australian, I don’t even understand your system or its language as it is written in Latin. Look to your own countrymen. And you, my little sweetheart, might just be a perfect example of why no one has stepped up to the plate and taken it further, or taken risks to their own lives, or kicked in the millions of dollars it would take...the moment any indication appears that that myth or its various accepted offshoots aren’t all there is to the fraud, out come the shears, snip snip snip...let’s nip this one in the bud...there’s someone trying to tell us that the whole myth from start to finish is a fabrication, and we cannot allow that. Lalalala...I’m singing so I’m deaf.
Congratulations. With everything you write, you make the point more clear. Like the man said, ‘You can’t handle the truth.’
And the truth is you don’t know who his parents were or where he was born or when his birthday was, all you’ve been doing the last four or five years is sticking the round peg of Stanley Ann Dunham into the square hole of mother-hood and you can’t make it fit, because there’s no physical evidence of her presence in Hawaii before 1963.
Carry on all you like.
Corsi said he has seen the transcripts. He is the one who, as a result of the transcripts he has seen, places SADO in ‘61 first in HI & then in Seattle. If you are asking me to call Corsi a liar, you have come to the wrong party.