You make it sound as if you were looking for something to help me out, believe me, I asked you that question about the differences in the writing only SO THAT YOU WOULD SEE THERE WAS A DIFFERENCE.
Most people haven't even noticed.
The answers to questions on that form that the kenyan did complete, was obviously what he wanted the immigration department to know.
The answers to the questions that the additional handwritng completed might just be what the person who added it, WANTS US TO KNOW.
You'll never know WHO it was because they didn't sign it. And you'll never know WHEN the material was added, because it isn't dated.
I gather that the formal, accepted method is to write a memo by hand or type it, with a date and a signature. If you scroll through the file, you'll see that's how most of the questions are treated.
Why should this one be different? The information added is crucial to the mythos of birth and parentage. It's simply not good enough IMO to have it appear UNDATED AND ANONYMOUSLY.
“.....Why should this one be different? The information added is crucial to the mythos of birth and parentage. It’s simply not good enough IMO to have it appear UNDATED AND ANONYMOUSLY.”
If this is the only document in that immigration file in which the kids name appears, then it is odd.
See my #10917 about added -on info
Fred Nerks wrote: “Most people haven’t even noticed.
The answers to questions on that form that the kenyan did complete, was obviously what he wanted the immigration department to know.
The answers to the questions that the additional handwritng completed might just be what the person who added it, WANTS US TO KNOW.
You’ll never know WHO it was because they didn’t sign it. And you’ll never know WHEN the material was added, because it isn’t dated.
I gather that the formal, accepted method is to write a memo by hand or type it, with a date and a signature. If you scroll through the file, you’ll see that’s how most of the questions are treated.
Why should this one be different? The information added is crucial to the mythos of birth and parentage. It’s simply not good enough IMO to have it appear UNDATED AND ANONYMOUSLY.”
Excellent points. If he was sitting there when the other person questioned the blanks, then BHO Sr. would have written the data himself. If he wasn’t there, then it would seem that protocol would require the person filling in the blanks to initial what was added.
I did NOT notice before that the documents had different handwriting. It’s crucial that BHO Sr. seems never to have mentioned that son—not to his friends in Hawaii, not to the newspaper reporters who wrote the stories about him, not to the people we see him partying with in photos, not on these documents, even just weeks after the alleged birth. We do have the tales told by the Kenyan “relatives” who claim to remember him carrying around a photo of little Barry.