The brief which shows the "conflicting and diametrically opposite decisions" regarding a number of the eligibility cases out there. Let's see if SCOTUS is paying attention & has the courage to do what's right and settle the issue!
From the SCOTUS docket:
No. 10-541
Title: Orly Taitz, Petitioner
v.
Thomas D. MacDonald, et al.
Docketed: October 25, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-15418)
Decision Date: March 15, 2010
Rehearing Denied: May 14, 2010
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Aug 12 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 24, 2010)
Nov 24 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Thomas D. MacDonald, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 7, 2011.
Dec 29 2010 Supplemental brief of petitioner Orly Taitz filed. (Distributed) [Edit: found below]
Taitz's SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (as posted on her site):
