To: LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; Red Steel; pissant; hoosiermama; null and void; Amityschild; Calpernia; ...
Bump...New Keyes v Obama court doc:
"PROCEEDING (IN CHAMBERS): DENYING EX PARTE MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM STAY OF DISCOVERY
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs Ex Parte Motion for Relief from Stay of Discovery. Pending resolution of Defendants Motion to Dismiss, the stay of discovery shall remain in place. See Dkt. 66. Should the discovery period be insufficient given the scheduling order in place, the partiesmay file for an extension of the discovery period.
The Ex Parte Motion is hereby DENIED."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20818346/03118914830
10,563 posted on
10/08/2009 1:55:17 PM PDT by
rxsid
(HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
To: rxsid
It was worth the shot to try. You never know.
To: rxsid
Should the discovery period be insufficient given the scheduling order in place, the parties may file for an extension of the discovery period. In other words , if it ever goes to discovery, the Obama defense team can't run out the clock.
To: rxsid; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; GOPJ; BP2; ...
![Image and video hosting by TinyPic](http://i25.tinypic.com/25g70k7.jpg)
... Update.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson