Absolutely, Holder’s lawyers better start thinking about their professional ethics and their futures as attorneys. Before a DOJ lawyer can take on the personal representation of any gov’t employee, there has to be an examination into whether representing the employee is in the interest of the government. There can never be a conflict of interest between the government’s interest and the employee’s interests. If there is, the gov’t lawyers are not authorized to expend taxpayer dollars to represent the employe’s interests and the employee must obtain personal counsel at his or her expense. As soon as the employee requests gov’t representation, the Civil Division is required to examine into the conduct of the gov’t employee. Before taking on the representation, the Civil Division must conclude that the gov’t employee was acting ‘in the scope of his employment’ with regard to the alleged acts If the gov’t lawyers have not exaimined into the Article II issue, they are incompetent. If they think they can take on the representation and not even look into the eligibility issue because they deem it is a pure political issue that is beyond judicial review and otherwise plaintiff’s lack standing, they are again incompetent as attorneys because the argument is specious. If they have examined into the eligibility issue and found Obama qualified, their defense of the plaintiff is as simple as producing the proof. Lastly, if they have examined into and found Obama unqualified, they are part of the coverup and need to be taken to task for perpitrating a fraud on the court. If I were Judge Carter, I would show cause them to determine why their representation of Obama is not in conflict with their primary obligation to represent the the interests of the U.S. Government.
Looks like a letter to the editor to me....