Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: GregNH

The argument for limited discovery is a great one since it would be necessary to challenge the gov’t’s deceptive pleading that the Legislative Branch is exclusively responsibile for determining eligibility and they did their job impeccibly. Leaving nothing for the Judiciary to review. LOL Who are these deceptive gov’t lawyers working for anyway? We are paying their salaries!! Their primary responsibility is to represent the United States and defend the Constitution.
It has always been an intriguing issue as to why Cheney never polled the House members for possible objections. It is just another odd failure of official responsibility in this crazy case.
I’ve sent it to Orly, but she has missed previous suggestions. If anyone knows how to reach her she needs to be told about Donofrio post to her motion for depostions of the House members in to the magistrate immediately.


10,453 posted on 09/18/2009 10:49:57 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10451 | View Replies ]


To: iontheball

It is my understanding that Pamela Barnett, one of the Plaintiffs, was sent Leo’s analysis also copied to Orly and Pamela has responded and given thanx.


10,454 posted on 09/18/2009 12:27:07 PM PDT by GregNH ("Dc Rally from the Ground" by me http://gwgjlm.blogspot.com/2009/09/dc-rally-from-ground.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10453 | View Replies ]

To: iontheball

PS Based on your opinion isn’t the AG office’s representation of Obama a conflict of intrest?


10,455 posted on 09/18/2009 12:28:23 PM PDT by GregNH ("Dc Rally from the Ground" by me http://gwgjlm.blogspot.com/2009/09/dc-rally-from-ground.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10453 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson