Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Steel; null and void; LucyT; BP2; STARWISE; MHGinTN; pissant; hoosiermama; Amityschild; ...
Bump...Update on Barnett v Obama in CA (Judge Carter)

Docket entries (in part):

"Filed & Entered: 09/10/2009 Docket Text Ex Parte Application for Order re Discovery Matter
Terminated: 09/16/2009

"Before the Court is Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Limited Stay of Discovery (the"Motion"). The Court finds the Motion to be appropriate for decision without oral argument. FED. R.C IV.P.78; Local Rule 7-15. After considering the moving and opposing papers thereon, and for thereasons set forth below, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion."

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19858504/03118784771

What does the entry "Terminated" (9/16) mean in relation to the Ex Parte Application (9/10)? Seems like the Application was Granted...so when then "Terminated?"

10,420 posted on 09/17/2009 2:27:19 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10251 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid
And this from the Docket entry:

"Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for Limited Stay of Discovery.

All discovery herein shall be stayed pending resolution of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, except for any discovery as to which Plaintiffs can demonstrate, to the satisfaction fo Magistrate Judge Nakazato, is necessary for the purpose of opposing the Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk shall serve this minute order on all parties to the action."

10,427 posted on 09/17/2009 2:47:08 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10420 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson