What I mean is if the Judge wants proof of eligibility he won’t use a form that does not prove it.
Its apparent from reading the statues in effect at the time that anyone could get what Obama has shown.
In the context of the complaint, the burden of proof is on Obama to prove his eligibility, not for Taitz to prove he is not eligible.
The COLB he has does not prove he is eligible.
The complaint does not determine the burden of proof; the law does.
The burden is on the plaintiff, as always.