Orly is contending he has not changed his position. Kreep’s argument, which I don’t accept, is that the case will be weakened with alternative claims. I understand that Kreep wants to focus exclusively on the requirement to be born on U.S. soil and not include the born to two U.S. citizen parents reqirement. This is just opposite of Mario Arpuzzo who is concentrating exclusively on the born to two U.S. citizen requirement. Mario believes the born to two U.S. citizen requirement requires no additional proof since Obama has admitted his father’s foreign alienage. The dispute seems more ego based than anything since I’m sure there is enough case work to go around. Kreep should work on developing his theory and then Orly can concentrated on the other - they should team the presentation. If she continues to argue this issue in public after the Judge has told her to work with Kreep, she is going to irritate the hell out of the one man who she needs on her side.
Kreep is arguing using his BAD INTERPRETATION of ‘NBC’. You also seem to go along with the theory that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii. As long as Kreep is allowed to litigate his mis-interpretion, he then lends credibility to Obama and his case of not needing both parents to be citizens and that his dual citizenship is not an issue.
This is very dangerous for our national security. We should never have had someone attain to the office of president who had foereign allegiances let alone foreign intrigues!
For the 1st time in American history, Ramadan will be celebrated at the foot of the Lincoln memorial. Obama is allowing Islam to politicize and sell their radical views right in the middle of our nation's most precious monuments. The one monument that holds to the most history of human rights and unless Kreep has an epiphany as to the truth, he will be one of Obama’s biggest witnesses.